Each presentation contains multiple bell ringers. Use the arrows to navigate through them.
There are several presentations available—scroll down the page to view them all.
Observe and Wonder
Use the arrows to navigate through all the bell ringer questions. Share an individual bell ringer using the embed code or link.
The Uneven Distribution of Earth's Mineral, Energy, and Groundwater Resources
Use the arrows located at the bottom of the presentation to navigate through all the bell ringer questions.
Resources are Evenly Spread: People may assume that these resources are evenly spread across the Earth. In reality, certain geographical areas are rich in specific minerals or energy resources, while others have very little.
Unlimited Resources: Another misconception is that these resources are unlimited. The reality is that many mineral and energy resources are finite, and their extraction can have significant environmental consequences.
Accessibility Equals Availability: Just because a resource is present in a location doesn’t mean it’s readily accessible. Political, environmental, economic, and technological factors can all affect the ability to extract and utilize a resource.
Water is Everywhere, so It’s Always Available: While water covers a large part of the Earth’s surface, fresh and accessible groundwater is not uniformly distributed. Some regions have abundant freshwater, while others suffer from scarcity.
Technology Will Solve Everything: Some people believe that technological advancements will inevitably solve all issues related to resource scarcity. Although technology plays a crucial role, it’s not a silver bullet. Conservation, sustainable management, and political cooperation are often equally vital.
Resource Wealth Equals Economic Wealth: A country rich in natural resources will not necessarily be economically wealthy. This belief overlooks complex factors such as how resources are managed, the stability of the government, global market conditions, and the potential for phenomena like the “resource curse,” where over-reliance on resource exports can lead to various economic and social problems.
Renewable Means Unending: Even renewable resources like groundwater must be managed sustainably. Over-extraction of groundwater, for example, can lead to depletion over time, turning a renewable resource into a non-renewable one in practical terms.
Local Abundance Equals Global Abundance: People might perceive abundance in their local area as indicative of global abundance. A region rich in a particular resource might not recognize the scarcity that exists elsewhere.
Resources and Reserves are the Same: People often confuse resources (the total amount of a material present in the Earth’s crust) with reserves (the portion that can be economically extracted with current technology). A large resource does not necessarily mean large or easy-to-extract reserves.
Natural Hazards
Use the arrows located at the bottom of the presentation to navigate through all the bell ringer questions.
Past Events Predict Exact Future Locations: While historical data can provide valuable insights, it doesn’t mean that future events will occur in the exact same locations.
All Natural Hazards Can Be Accurately Forecasted: Some natural hazards, such as earthquakes, are notoriously difficult to predict with precision, even with a detailed understanding of the geologic forces involved.
Understanding Geologic Forces Equals Prevention: Understanding the forces at play can help in forecasting, but it doesn’t mean we can prevent natural hazards from occurring.
Mapping Eliminates Risk: Creating a map of past events can help in preparedness, but it doesn’t eliminate the risk or guarantee safety. Unforeseen factors can always come into play.
Frequency Equals Predictability: Just because an event has occurred frequently in the past does not mean it will necessarily continue to occur with the same frequency in the future.
Human Activities Have No Impact on Natural Hazards: In some cases, human activities like mining, reservoir-induced seismicity, and land-use changes can influence the occurrence of natural hazards. This is a complex interplay that might not be considered in all historical mapping.
New Technologies Make Forecasting Foolproof: Although technology has significantly advanced our ability to understand and forecast some natural hazards, no method is foolproof, and there remains a level of uncertainty.
Monitoring and Minimizing Human Impact on the Environment
Use the arrows located at the bottom of the presentation to navigate through all the bell ringer questions.
Misconception: All human activities negatively impact the Earth. Truth: While many human activities can harm the environment, there are also numerous efforts to conserve, restore, and maintain ecological balance, such as reforestation, sustainable farming, and renewable energy usage.
Misconception: Extinctions are always caused by human activities. Truth: Although human activities have caused some extinctions, species can also go extinct due to natural events such as climate changes, volcanic eruptions, or competition with other species.
Misconception: Human activities’ effects on the environment are always immediate. Truth: Some impacts of human activities on the environment develop slowly over time and may not be immediately noticeable, such as soil erosion or groundwater contamination.
Misconception: All human-caused environmental damage is irreversible. Truth: While some environmental damage may be permanent, there are cases where natural recovery or human-led restoration efforts can mitigate or even reverse the damage.
Misconception: Human needs always outweigh environmental considerations. Truth: Human well-being is often intertwined with healthy ecosystems. Damage to the environment can have direct and indirect negative impacts on human health and prosperity.
Misconception: Technology alone will solve environmental problems. Truth: While technology can be part of the solution, responsible usage, understanding potential negative impacts, and a holistic approach are often required to address complex environmental issues.
Misconception: Human activities only affect local environments. Truth: Activities in one area can have far-reaching impacts, such as air pollution traveling through air currents or water pollution affecting downstream ecosystems.
Misconception: Humans are separate from nature. Truth: Humans are part of the biosphere, and their actions can have broad impacts on ecosystems, other species, and even the climate.
Misconception: All industrial activities are harmful to the environment. Truth: Many industries are adopting sustainable practices, and technological innovations are allowing for more environmentally friendly production and development.
Misconception: Complex environmental issues have simple solutions. Truth: Environmental issues are often interconnected and multifaceted, requiring comprehensive and thoughtful solutions that take into account various factors and potential consequences.
Human Population and Per-Capita Consumption of Natural Resources Impacts
Use the arrows located at the bottom of the presentation to navigate through all the bell ringer questions.
Misconception: Global warming is solely caused by human activities.
- Clarification: While human activities are the primary drivers of recent global warming, natural factors like volcanic eruptions and solar radiation variations can also influence the climate. However, the rapid rise in global temperatures since the industrial revolution is largely attributable to human activities.
Misconception: The sun is getting hotter, causing Earth to warm up.
- Clarification: Changes in solar radiation do play a role in climate change but are not the main cause of the current warming trend. Studies show that solar output has been relatively constant or even slightly decreasing over the last few decades.
Misconception: Climate change is just part of a natural cycle.
- Clarification: While the Earth’s climate has undergone natural cycles of warming and cooling over millions of years, the current rate of temperature rise is unprecedented in recent history and aligns with the rise of greenhouse gas emissions from human activities.
Misconception: More CO₂ is good because plants need it to grow.
- Clarification: While plants do use CO₂ for photosynthesis, excessive levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere can lead to global warming. The current rapid increase in CO₂ levels is harmful to many ecosystems, including oceans, which are becoming more acidic.
Misconception: The ozone hole is causing global warming.
- Clarification: The ozone hole and global warming are two distinct issues. The ozone hole is related to the depletion of the ozone layer by chemicals called CFCs, which doesn’t directly cause global warming. However, both issues are related to human activities and their impact on our planet’s atmosphere.
Misconception: Volcanic eruptions emit more CO₂ than human activities.
- Clarification: Volcanic eruptions release a fraction of CO₂ compared to anthropogenic sources. Human activities emit over 100 times more CO₂ annually than all the world’s volcanoes combined.
Misconception: If some areas are experiencing colder temperatures, global warming isn’t real.
- Clarification: “Global warming” refers to the long-term increase in Earth’s average surface temperature. It doesn’t mean that every place will be warmer every year. There can be fluctuations and anomalies, but the overarching trend is upward.
Misconception: Melting ice at the North Pole (Arctic) will cause sea levels to rise significantly.
- Clarification: Sea ice is already floating on water, so when it melts, it doesn’t significantly change sea levels. However, melting land ice (like glaciers and ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica) does contribute to sea-level rise.
Factors that Have Caused the Rise in Global Temperatures
Use the arrows located at the bottom of the presentation to navigate through all the bell ringer questions.
Uniform Impact: People might believe that all areas of the world are affected equally by population growth and resource consumption. In reality, impacts can be localized and vary significantly based on regional factors.
Inevitability: There’s a misconception that negative impacts from population growth and resource consumption are inevitable. With sustainable practices and technology, it’s possible to mitigate many negative consequences.
Technology is Always Helpful: Some might think that technology always benefits the environment, whereas certain technologies can exacerbate environmental problems if not implemented responsibly.
Climate Change is Only About Temperature: While rising global temperatures are a concern, climate change also encompasses issues like changing weather patterns, sea level rise, and ocean acidification.
Natural vs. Human-made Climate Change: Some believe that current changes in the climate are solely part of a natural cycle and not influenced by human activity. In reality, while the Earth’s climate has changed naturally over time, current rates of change are unprecedented and closely linked to human activities.
Population Density is the Problem: There’s a belief that densely populated areas always have a larger negative environmental impact. However, dense areas can sometimes be more energy-efficient and sustainable than sprawling, less populated areas.
Resource Consumption is Only a Modern Issue: Some might think that overconsumption is a problem only of the modern era, overlooking the historical instances where societies faced challenges due to overconsumption.
Climate Change Only Affects Polar Regions: The effects of climate change aren’t confined to polar areas. While melting ice caps are a visible sign, changes are occurring globally, affecting various ecosystems and human societies.
Immediate Solutions: A common misconception is that the effects of actions to combat climate change should be immediately visible. In reality, there’s often a lag between action and noticeable change in environmental trends.
Personal Action is Insignificant: People might believe that individual or community-level actions won’t make a difference in the grand scheme of things. However, collective small actions can lead to significant positive impacts.